Topline growth looked healthy — but spend grew 71% while paid conversions grew only 32%. A deep dive into channel-level unit economics surfaced a €1.3M reallocation opportunity hiding in plain sight.
| Channel | Current | Proposed | Δ Spend | Δ Conv. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid Social (dominant) | €3.71M | €2.40M | −€1.31M | −19,000 |
| Influencer | €1.70M | €2.40M | +€701k | +18,750 |
| Paid Search | €75k | €600k | +€525k | +54,070 |
| Podcast partnerships | €3k | €250k | +€247k | +25k–49k |
| Underperforming social | €447k | €0 | −€447k | −6,400 |
| Test budget (new) | — | €298k | +€298k | +7,500 |
The entire analysis ran inside an isolated Docker container. The dataset was mounted read-only, every computation happened locally within that sandbox, and no client data ever crossed the container boundary — nothing was uploaded to third-party services, embedded into external tools, or persisted outside the ephemeral environment. When the container is destroyed, the data is gone. This is how sensitive commercial data should be handled: the analysis travels to the data, not the other way around.